Archive for the ‘articles’ category

Preserving the Planet, Straining the Relationship: Therapists Report Increase in Green Disputes

January 17th, 2010

Thomas Doherty and others were interviewed about ecological concerns as they affect family and relationships.

See article below as published originally HERE.

The New York Times

By LESLIE KAUFMAN
Published: January 17, 2010
Gordon Fleming says his girlfriend, Shelly Cobb, is in a “high-priestess phase” of environmentalism, which includes raising chickens at their home in Santa Barbara, Calif.

Gordon Fleming says his girlfriend, Shelly Cobb, is in a “high-priestess phase” of environmentalism, which includes raising chickens at their home in Santa Barbara, Calif.

Gordon Fleming is, by his own account, an environmentally sensitive guy.

He bikes 12 1/2 miles to and from his job at a software company outside Santa Barbara, Calif. He recycles as much as possible and takes reusable bags to the grocery store.

Still, his girlfriend, Shelly Cobb, feels he has not gone far enough.

Ms. Cobb chides him for running the water too long while he shaves or showers. And she finds it “depressing,” she tells him, that he continues to buy a steady stream of items online when her aim is for them to lead a less materialistic life.

Mr. Fleming, who says he became committed to Ms. Cobb “before her high-priestess phase,” describes their conflicts as good-natured — mostly.

But he refuses to go out to eat sushi with her anymore, he said, because he cannot stand to hear her quiz the waiters.

“None of it is sustainable or local,” he said, “and I am not eating cod or rockfish.”

As awareness of environmental concerns has grown, therapists say they are seeing a rise in bickering between couples and family members over the extent to which they should change their lives to save the planet.

In households across the country, green lines are being drawn between those who insist on wild salmon and those who buy farmed, those who calculate their carbon footprint and those who remain indifferent to greenhouse gases.

“As the focus on climate increases in the public’s mind, it can’t help but be a part of people’s planning about the future,” said Thomas Joseph Doherty, a clinical psychologist in Portland, Ore., who has a practice that focuses on environmental issues. “It touches every part of how they live: what they eat, whether they want to fly, what kind of vacation they want.”

While no study has documented how frequent these clashes have become, therapists agree that the green issue can quickly become poisonous because it is so morally charged. Friends or family members who are not devoted to the environmental cause can become irritated by life choices they view as ostentatiously self-denying or politically correct.

Those with a heightened focus on environmental issues, on the other hand, can find it hard to refrain from commenting on things that they view as harmful to Earth — driving an oversize S.U.V., for example.

Shelly Cobb is working to follow the permaculture approach in her garden.

Shelly Cobb is working to follow the permaculture approach in her garden.

Sandy Shulmire, a psychologist who lives in Portland, confesses that when she is visiting her sister in Abita Springs, La., she cannot resist bugging her about not recycling her plastic and cardboard, even though she knows she will be perceived as “bossy.”

Cherl Petso, an editor of an online magazine who lives in Seattle, says trips to visit her parents in Idaho can be “tense at times,” in part because she and her mother interpret each other’s choices as judgmental.

If Ms. Petso prepares a vegan meal for the family, her parents prepare hot dogs to go alongside. Her parents serve on throwaway Styrofoam plates; she grabs a plate that can be cleaned and reused. Her mother, who says she prefers the way food tastes when it is served on Styrofoam, notes that washing dishes has its own environmental costs.

Linda Buzzell, a family and marriage therapist for 30 years who lives in Santa Barbara and is a co-editor of “Ecotherapy: Healing with Nature in Mind,” cautions that the repercussions of environmental differences can be especially severe for couples.

“The danger arises when one partner undergoes an environmental ‘waking up’ process way before the other, leaving a new values gap between them,” Ms. Buzzell said.

Changing the family diet because of environmental concerns can be particularly loaded, Ms. Buzzell added. She warns wives and mothers not to move a family toward vegetarianism before everyone is ready.

“Food is such an emotional issue,” she said.

Christienne deTournay Birkhahn, executive director of the EcoMom Alliance, an organization based in Marin County that provides education to women who want to have their families live more sustainably, finds that disputes over how green is green enough often divide along predictable lines by sex.

Women, Ms. Birkhahn said, often see men as not paying sufficient attention to the home. Men, for their part, “really want to make a large impact and aren’t interested in a small impact,” she said.

That is certainly the case in her own marriage, she said. Her husband, Kurt, an engineer and federal employee, sometimes seems to be baiting her by placing plastic yogurt cups in the garbage or leaving the reusable shopping bags in the car and coming home with disposable bags instead.

Gordon Fleming orders more things online than his girlfriend would like, but he makes sure to recycle the packaging.

Gordon Fleming orders more things online than his girlfriend would like, but he makes sure to recycle the packaging.

In the ensuing discussions, Ms. Birkhahn said, her husband argues that the changes she is making may have a large effect on their lives but have little or no effect on the planet. He fought every step of the way against the gray-water system she installed in their bathroom to recycle water to flush the toilet, calling it a waste of time and money, she said. The system cost $1,200 to install.

Ms. Birkhahn said she found it hard to dispute his point but thought it was irrelevant. “I am trying to be a role model for my son,” she said.

Ms. Buzzell suggests that couples can overcome such differences if they treat each other gently. She advises partners who have a newfound passion for the issue to change only a few things at a time and provide lots of explanation.

“It is like exercise,” Ms. Buzzell said. “Take it slowly.”

Still, Robert Brulle, a professor of environment and sociology at Drexel University in Philadelphia, said he had seen divorces among couples who realized that their values were putting them on very different long-term trajectories.

“One still wants to live the American dream with all that means, and the other wants to give up on big materialistic consumption,” Dr. Brulle said. “Those may not be compatible.”

Mr. Fleming, in Santa Barbara, said that he was not quite at that point, but that he was drawing some firm lines.

He continues to make purchases on eBay — although he immediately breaks down the delivery boxes and puts them in the recycling bin to “avoid scrutiny.”

And unless Ms. Cobb can make peace with his long, hot showers, the issue may someday be a deal breaker.

“I like to see the water pouring down,” he said, sounding utterly unrepentant.

Ecopsychology: Mind, Body, Spirit. . .and Planet • An Interview with Thomas Joseph Doherty, Psy.D.

December 15th, 2009

Alternative and Complementary Therapies • December 2009

Thomas Joseph Doherty

Thomas Joseph Doherty


READ THE FULL
article:

pdf Ecopsychology: Mind, Body, Spirit. . .and PlanetAn Interview with Thomas Joseph Doherty, Psy.D. by Lori Tripoli.

The best natural healer turns out to be nature

May 17th, 2009

Thomas was featured in the Portland Oregonian’s May 27, 2009 article The best natural healer turns out to be nature discussing the field of ecopsychology and links between mental health and connection with nature and green spaces.

See article below as published originally HERE.

Read the article below in its entirety or download a .pdf version:
pdf The best natural healer turns out to be nature by Dennis Peck

leaf-div

The best natural healer turns out to be nature

By Dennis Peck, The Oregonian

May 27, 2009, 9:12AM
Thomas Doherty says studies show the more people can come into contact with nature, the better their health, and he walks his talk by hiking in Forest Park with his daughter Eva every weekend.

Thomas Doherty says studies show the more people can come into contact with nature, the better their health, and he walks his talk by hiking in Forest Park with his daughter Eva every weekend.

By chance, a small hospital in Pennsylvania became the setting of a remarkable experiment. Scientist Roger Ulrich noticed some surgery patients recovered in a room with a view of leafy trees, while others recovered in an identical room, except its windows faced a brick wall.

Ulrich decided to test whether the view made any difference in the outcome for patients. He looked back at records on gall bladder surgery over a period of 10 years. The results proved enlightening.

Patients with the tree view were able to leave the hospital about a day earlier than those with a wall view, the study revealed. Patients with trees in sight also requested significantly less pain medication and reported fewer problems to nurses than wall-view patients. Contact with nature, even as limited as a view through a window, enhanced recovery from illness.

Researchers have learned much about the restorative effects of nature since Ulrich’s landmark study appeared in 1984. Studies repeatedly have shown that contact with nature can lower blood pressure, reduce anxiety, relieve stress, sharpen mental states and, among children with attention and conduct disorders, improve behavior and learning. Regardless of cultural background, people consistently prefer natural settings over man-made environments.

“We know that exposure to natural environments has clearly beneficial physiological effects,” says Portland psychologist Thomas Joseph Doherty.

But if exposure to nature is beneficial, what happens when we withdraw from it? That’s one of the defining questions for ecopsychology — an emerging branch of psychology rooted in the idea that mental health requires, in addition to strong bonds with fellow humans, a connection with nature and an understanding of our place in the ecosystem we are a part of.

Doherty, who recently launched the peer-reviewed Journal of Ecopsychology, is one of many psychologists concerned that the loss of connections with nature has the potential to inflict deep harm to human well-being.

“By losing that connection, we lose some of our ability to restore ourselves,” Doherty says.

Many of the ideas and concerns of ecopsychology emerged in the 1960s counterculture movement. But the term “ecopsychology” was coined in the 1990s by an influential theorist and writer, Theodore Roszak, a professor of history at California State University, Hayward. Roszak believes psychologists have a duty to address environmental problems.

“Therapists know a great deal about the private anguish that divides the psyche and breaks the heart. But they have so far not applied their knowledge and their skill to our dysfunctional environmental relations,” Roszak said in a recent essay. “Ecopsychology seeks to broaden therapeutic work and psychological research into environmentally relevant areas.”

The problem has become urgent — “one of the central psychological problems of our times,” according to Peter Kahn, a University of Washington developmental psychologist. He points to our shrinking interactions with nature — animal and plant species dwindling in numbers or going extinct; atmospheric pollutants and artificial lighting blotting out views of the stars; aircraft blaring machine noise into every corner of remaining wilderness, fossil fuel emissions altering the entire planet’s climate — and he notes that the things we are losing are disappearing quickly.

“We don’t necessarily recognize that it’s happening,” says Rachel Severson, a doctoral candidate in psychology at UW who has co-authored studies with Kahn. “We don’t recognize that we are adapting, and that there is a diminishing of our experience in terms of human well-being and flourishing.”

Simulated nature
For insight into the problem, the UW psychologists conducted a series of experiments using high-definition plasma screens that displayed real-time views of plants, birds and other wildlife to office workers in windowless rooms. Exposure to simulated nature produced measurable gains in the workers’ sense of well-being and clarity of thinking.

Next, the psychologists compared workers in an office with windows facing a real outdoor greenspace, and workers in a windowless office with and without plasma screens displaying views of the greenspace. Researchers compared how long it took workers’ heart rates to recover after a series of pop-quiz type tasks.

Real window views proved more restorative than simulated views via plasma screen, which proved no different from a blank wall in the heart rate recovery test.

“People recovered better from low-level stress by looking at an actual view of nature,” Severson says.

Researchers don’t know why real view worked better. The limits of a two-dimensional display might have failed to provide the necessary stimulus to the brain. The UW psychologists believe the explanation lies in the relationship between the person and the natural scene.

“The important part is knowing that if you walked outside you could touch the tree, or smell the leaves. It’s part of an actual, direct experience,” Severson says. “You don’t interact with digital nature. You are an observer.”

But rapid advances in technologically simulated nature may be changing what people consider to be the full human experience of nature, according to Kahn and colleagues. “Kids are spending more time playing video games, interacting with computers, with technologies that are more and more compelling with each generation,” Severson says. “That’s been the impetus for much of our work.”

Dealing with dread
Psychologists also are responding to the growing level of anxiety and feelings of helplessness among people alarmed by the onslaught of bad news about the environment: melting glaciers, thawing permafrost, collapsing fisheries, mercury contamination throughout ocean food chains, and on and on.

People have myriad responsibilities competing for their attention, Doherty points out. They have pressing duties as parents, spouses, employees, citizens and to themselves. On top of that, Doherty says “you are shoehorning in yet another duty,” that of planetary caretaker.

Citing Roszak, Doherty says that part of the answer supplied by ecopsychology is to validate that an emotional connection to nature is normal and healthy. Doing so will help the environmental movement be more effective, he says, by appealing to positive ecological bonds rather than promoting conservation based on messages of fear or shame.

Green Is The New Frazzled

May 1st, 2008

From Common Ground Magazine:

Green Is The New Frazzled

How to save the world without losing your mind

by E.B. Boyd

ecoanxiety

ecoanxiety

Thomas contributed to this discussion of individuals’ coping with emotions regarding climate change and sustainability.

READ the article HERE in pdf format pdf

Originally published online HERE at Common Ground Magazine.

Curbing climate change – Every little bit helps

March 1st, 2008

Curbing climate change :: Every little bit helps

Curbing climate change :: Every little bit helps

Curbing climate change

Every little bit helps
Psychologists are going green with these planet-pleasing practices

By Amy Novotney
Monitor staff

“You don’t necessarily want to get caught up in the details of what kind of light bulbs and paper you’re using if you’re flying around the country all the time and not doing something about that.”

Thomas Doherty
Portland, Ore.


It may be an inconvenient truth for some but it seems as if everyone’s going green. Here are a few ways psychologists in particular can help protect the planet.

Save a tree; use your computer. Review the resources you consume daily and make adjustments as needed, says Thomas Doherty, PsyD, a Portland, Ore., psychologist who helps clients develop more sustainable lifestyles. Psychologists, for example, tend to use a lot of paper—for reports, presentations, client files and more. To curb paper waste, Indiana University cognitive psychology professor Michelle Verges, PhD, posts her syllabi and other course information online and uses both sides of the paper when she does need to print. Researchers can reduce paper use by collecting data via the Web when possible.

Confidentiality concerns may prevent clinicians and researchers from reusing paper, so Doherty recommends finding a local source for buying post-consumer recycled paper. Not only does recycled paper save trees, it keeps more trees sucking up carbon dioxide from the air, reducing the amount of greenhouse gases in the air. Confidential documents may be shredded and then recycled—at least in most areas, Doherty says. In Phoenix—a city that does not accept shredded paper for recycling—psychologist Sherri Gallagher, PhD, says she puts it in her compost and later uses it to fertilize her garden.

Practitioners may even want to consider the example of Portland, Ore., psychologist Jeffrey Noethe, PhD, who went almost completely paperless. When Noethe does patient intakes, for example, he scans and shreds each client’s information form and signature pages and types up notes after each session. He does all of his scheduling and billing electronically, as well. As for security, he says his encrypted computer files are much safer than paper copies in a file cabinet.

“There are more people who know how to use a crowbar than know how to hack a computer,” says Noethe, who is on the steering committee of the Portland-based group Psychology for a Sustainable Future, which explores the connections among psychology, ecology and sustainability.

leaf-div

READ MORE of this article HERE at The American Psychological Association’s Monitor on Psychology.

Well, Doctor, I Have This Recycling Problem

February 16th, 2008

Thomas Doherty and other Portland psychologists were interviewed about Ecopsychology and people’s concerns about environmental issues.

See article below as published originally HERE.

Keith Payne, a graduate student at Lewis & Clark College, relaxed before class at a campus reflection place. Ecopsychology classes are taught at the college.

Keith Payne, a graduate student at Lewis & Clark College, relaxed before class at a campus reflection place. Ecopsychology classes are taught at the college.

The New York Times

By GABRIELLE GLASER
Published: February 16, 2008

PORTLAND, Ore.

SOME months ago, Catherine McLendon and her husband, Martin, decided to talk to a psychologist. The couple have a blended family with three adolescent sons, and they wanted guidance in easing some typical adjustment problems.

But a few sessions in, Ms. McLendon, a floral designer, and Mr. McLendon, a bus driver, realized their worries extended beyond the demands of work, school and extracurricular sports.

Ms. McLendon was troubled by the family’s consumption habits, while Mr. McLendon worried about the disappearance of green space. In therapy, their psychologist, Sandy Shulmire, began providing the family with practical instructions for reducing anxiety, and their carbon footprint.

Dr. Shulmire is a practitioner of ecopsychology, a new form of therapy that is starting to find a following in this green-minded corner of the United States. Like traditional therapy, ecopsychology examines personal interactions and family systems, while also encouraging patients to develop a relationship to nature.

Therapists like Dr. Shulmire use several techniques, from encouraging patients besieged by multitasking to spend more time outdoors to exploring how their upbringing and family background influence their approach to the natural world.

leaf-div

As part of their therapy, the McLendons bought a solar-powered water heater and energy-conserving doors. As a family, they volunteer for beach cleanups and tree-planting events, and also instruct their children to play outside every day.

“Sometimes it is just so tough to get those kids out from behind their Nintendos and long showers,” Ms. McLendon said. “I feel like a real nag. But I just keep trying. If my kids see me use reusable shopping bags, they’ll be more likely to do it, too.”

The word ecopsychology was popularized in the early 1990s by, among others, the social critic Theodore Roszak, who wrote two books that explored the link between mental health and ecological health. Its practice now takes a variety of forms.

Some therapists offer strategies for eco-anxiety in private sessions, or lead discussion groups for the conservation-minded. More than 120 therapists from Alaska to Uruguay are listed as practitioners at the International Community for Ecopsychology Web site (ecopsychology.org), and colleges in the United States and Europe offer courses in the field.

Ecopsychology lacks a scientific journal, and no Sigmund Freud-type figure has fully developed its theory. For now, the America Psychological Association is neutral toward the practice. “It is an emerging field of study and we are certainly watching it,” said Kim Mills, a spokeswoman for the organization.

Some psychologists are skeptical that the practice of ecopsychology has any provable benefits.

“There are lots of interesting and novel ideas out there, but I am not aware of any research that shows that this approach would be helpful,” said Scott O. Lilienfeld, a psychology professor at Emory University. “Even if one believes that global warming is caused by humans, there is a fine line between therapy and advocacy. Therapists need to mind that line.”

Dr. Lilienfeld said therapists must also be aware of the larger psychological issues for patients worried about the environment.

“If the patient has generalized anxiety disorder, he or she is going to be worrying about almost everything,” Dr. Lilienfeld said. “So are concerns about global warming just one piece of the elephant? Therapists need to be cautious before focusing too heavily on one psychological issue.”

But ecopsychology can help patients come to terms with their feelings about the natural world, said Thomas Doherty, who teaches ecopsychology at the Lewis & Clark Graduate School of Education and Counseling in Portland. “People are overwhelmed,” said Dr. Doherty, who also sees patients in private practice. “They need help in learning how to balance their roles as parents, as children, as citizens and now as ecocitizens.”

For clients with global warming anxiety, Dr. Doherty suggests a multistep process that is similar to kicking an addiction. He advises them to accept the limits of what they can control. He recommends “fasts” from shopping, e-mailing, and the news, while cultivating calmer pursuits like meditation or gardening.

Dr. Jeff Noethe, a Portland psychologist, says that when seeing new patients, he asks them about the amount of time they spend outdoors.

“We think nothing of asking about how much alcohol people drink or how many cigarettes they smoke,” Dr. Noethe said. “But when we overlook the natural world, we’re overlooking the most fundamental aspect of who we are as human beings.”

As part of his therapy, Dr. Bill Plotkin, a Colorado psychologist, leads groups into deserts, canyons and mountains. During such trips, which range in cost from $650 to $2,300, he urges clients to lie on the earth in a bonding exercise.

“I tell them to imagine the earth as a healthy parent,” said Dr. Plotkin, the author of “Nature and the Human Soul: Cultivating Wholeness and Community in a Fragmented World.”

Small children are often encouraged to dig for worms or play in the snow, but such freedom outdoors usually gives way to more structured activities by middle school, he said.

“We need to step back and ask a bigger question,” he said, “and that is: How might my children have the most fulfilling and rewarding life possible?”

Since Angeline Tiamson, a graduate student in counseling at Lewis & Clark, took Dr. Doherty’s ecopsychology class last fall, she has embarked on a new way of thinking. Instead of shopping or joining her friends at a bar, she relaxes by taking long walks, even in the rain. She still studies in coffee shops, but now she sips tea from a pink steel cup she carries in her backpack.

When she is on campus, she drifts to the low, wide trunk of an old black walnut tree, a spot she found during a nature exercise for class. She sits there for several minutes: no iPod, no cellphone, no laptop. She rubs her hand over the bark, and sniffs the empty shells left behind by squirrels.

“You can’t have a good relationship with anything if you are afraid or feel guilty,” Ms. Tiamson said. “You have to love it first.”

sustainable paths through modern life

October 9th, 2007

Thomas’ work on sustainability was featured in the Portland Tribune as seen below.

READ/DOWNLOAD the article HERE in pdf format pdf

Originally published online HERE at the Portland Tribune

leaf-div

Portland Tribune

Doctor takes in mind, body, planet

Counselor helps find sustainable paths through modern life

By LEE WILLIAMS

Pamplin Media Group, Oct 9, 2007

L.E. BASKOW / PAMPLIN MEDIA GROUP

Dr. Thomas Doherty maps out the influences on an individual’s environmental identity. His “ecopsychological” practice focuses on helping clients visualize — and realize — lifestyle changes.

Dr. Thomas Doherty maps out the influences on an individual’s environmental identity. His “ecopsychological” practice focuses on helping clients visualize — and realize — lifestyle changes.

For sustainable living, we tell ourselves,“Think globally, act locally.”

But how do we act personally?

Adopting each and every suggestion for greener living, immediately upon receiving it, is unrealistic for working adults, who have to manage jobs and families. And as in any realm of behavior, drastic changes may not be lasting ones.

Over the past decade, a new discipline, ecopsychology, has begun to bloom. The goal is to help trace individualized, realistic paths to enduring sustainable lifestyles.

“The environmental movement is the largest grass-roots movement in the world right now, and we’re not out to give people more information,” says Dr. Thomas Doherty, who is initiating what is very likely Portland’s first ecopsychological practice from his offices in the Hollywood District.

“There’s a glut of information right now,” Doherty says. “So the question is, What to do with the information? How can we sift through it all to make it personally relevant, and find sustainability on an everyday level?”

Doherty is part of a loose movement whose members, in general, believe mental health connects to the environment. This founding principle then can guide personal sustainable actions.

Counseling can take the form of counselor-led support groups, personalized life coaching, or traditional therapy with a “green-minded” counselor. Practical tools to help achieve one’s personal green goals can be as simple as introducing green spaces into everyday routines (Portland is blessed with numerous parks for such escapes) to embarking on “news fasts” — that is, curtailing the daily barrage of doomsday-themed environmental stories that emerge from the media.

News can add to stress

Some ecopsychologists embrace anti-consumerism. Doherty’s system, which he calls “Sustainable Self,” aims for a slow and mindful change. His approach has four basic planks: recognize that the environment is an issue; center yourself and accept the limits of what you can do and control; celebrate and nurture victories and accept faults; and then take action, however small, daily.

Daily battles can be overwhelming, he says, and even seem futile given the media attention devoted to massive issues such as global warming.

“I struggle all the time. An ethical life is a challenge,” Doherty says. “We’ve just had a child, and our family is back East. How do we visit our loved ones without flying? And with politics, I fall into the same bind as everyone else. I’ll open the newspaper or turn on NPR and listen to a news story, and my heart rate is up, my blood pressure is up, and I start to talk to myself,” he says. “I go back and try to practice what I preach: recognize, validate, center and accept, nurture and celebrate. … Maybe that’s in part why I came up with it, because it’s so necessary for me to do.”

Doherty grew up in Buffalo, N.Y., and completed his undergraduate studies at Columbia University in New York City. Urban settings to be sure, and he admits he was no outdoors man.

“I’d never slept in a tent until I was 21,” he says.

But he headed west, in true pioneer fashion. Doherty was a counselor for an outdoor program for teenagers called Vision Quest that traveled by wagon train. Taken with the wilderness, he became a river guide on the Grand Canyon for two seasons — time that carved out a deep impression.

“When you’re in that place, you’re immersed in so much,” he recalls, “the natural history, the native cultures, and the politics of the dams and how it links to the whole West. You start to get a sense of how things work: OK, the dam lets water in and out through the day, because of air conditioning and electrical use in Phoenix. It’s all linked together. You’re out in this pristine area but learn there’s no such thing as wilderness, really, because it’s all connected.”

Small changes can ripple

In addition to counseling, Doherty also leads Green Minds, a monthly discussion group open to anyone who wants to chat about positive environmental change over coffee. Green Minds meets every first or second Friday at World Cup Coffee (721 N.W. Ninth Ave., No. 175, in the Ecotrust building).

This fall, Doherty also began teaching Foundations of Ecopsychology at Lewis & Clark College. The course is geared toward enrollees in the college’s graduate psychology program but is open to continuing-education students as well.

For his own graduate degree, Doherty spent much of his time counseling patients in a cardiac rehabilitation unit. This was good preparation for steering bodies toward greener paths.

“I saw how hard it is for people to change behaviors,” he says. “You can’t just wag your finger and say, ‘Change,’ and the system doesn’t necessarily make it easy. But if you start with yourself, I do think it will have a ripple effect.”